Unipolar Induction

But this is all baby talk. My thought, of course, crawled on. It turned out that the very knowledge that we don’t give a damn whether the magnetic field rotates or not turns out to be important and, accordingly, the coils of electromagnets rotate (and Tesla, pay attention, namely electromagnets) or stand still.
Unipolar Induction

I draw your attention to the description of the technology shown in Fig.5 by Tesla himself. He proposed to abandon the external exciting magnets altogether (to which I indicated in the text of the “notes”) and to obtain the magnetic field in the disk by passing the generated current through the external circuit. – He calls this circuit “one or more coils”, but I will tell you more – this circuit, in an improved version, Tesla himself patented separately, after four years of research, – in ANOTHER patent! This is his bifilar coil “FOR ELECTROMAGNETS” !!!This was my insight. Now it becomes clear why Tesla patented this “strange” patent during this period of his creative activity (as noted in his famous article Oliver Nichelson). And it becomes clear the very purpose, formulated in the name of the patent bifilyarki.

Just so guess that you can do without external magnets is very difficult, because This idea is described by Tesla himself very vaguely. Immediately it becomes clear how to apply the superproperties of the bifilya. After all, why does Tesla talk about “one or more” coil, and not about a full coil? Because, in a conventional flat coil, there is a high resistance to current, which is noticeably reduced in the design of the bifilar by increasing the potential difference in the neighboring turns (which is also practically impossible to guess without reading the patent itself in the Russian version). It is worth noting here that the coil works NOT IN RESONANCE, since the current is not alternating, but constant. But nevertheless, its properties are an order of magnitude more efficient than that of an ordinary flat coil wound in one wire. This means that the magnetic field created by such a bifilar coil will be much stronger!

But wait, the readers will say. What kind of “integrity” of the device can we talk about, if it is known that the disk needs to be rotated, which means you need to have a connection with the motor, and therefore the bearings for the axis of the device cannot escape, not to mention the “transfer” mechanisms inside the electric motor itself? – The most value of unipolar induction is that if you apply voltage to such a disk, the disk begins to rotate. And as we see from the last article, the coil creating the magnetic field for this disk can also rotate with the disk itself and be fixed on it, i.e. be one with him.

Little interrupted and note the following. In his patent to the unipolar generator, taking into account the friction on the side surface of the external removable contact disk (and hence the huge braking torque – and the larger the radius, the larger it is), the ingenious Tesla suggests using a device consisting of TWO disks. Through a flexible conductive belt, the current is transmitted from the outer surface of one to the outer surface of the other, and it offers to release the voltage-removing contacts against the center of the axes of each disk, which ensures the minimum friction that is possible. The only inconvenience, as we see, lies in the most flexible belt. 

I would venture to look further than Tesla himself allowed himself (he just did not know at that time that the magnets could be rotated with the disk). – The obvious improvement is this way: to put both disks on one axis! It is clear that both axles (for two discs) are insulated from each other by a non-conductive connector. We receive the generator where the flexible belt is not necessary, since electricity from one disk to another (external circuits) is transmitted through a conventional wire. It is clear that both disks, although they rotate with the axis, are fixed relative to each other (the wire too). Further under the description of the patent.

Okay, back to thinking about our “eternal engine.” I have already said that the unipolar effect arising in the disk can be used and vice versa, i.e. as a motor. Nothing prevents us from planting both the drive that generates the current and the drive that serves as a motor – on a single axis. Both disks are relatively fixed to each other. So, we got rid of one more connection (between the engine and the generator). The problem of current-collecting contacts remains, going both from the generator and to the electric motor. The exit from a problem situation lies on the surface. – We do not need contacts at all! We transfer the received voltage from the generator to the engine DIRECTLY !!! – After a couple of wires. No, even through one wire, because the second conductor is the common axis, in this case, for two disks;).

The remaining sole contact of the device (WHOLE) with the outside world is the bearings at the ends of the axis. It’s simple. – we make the “magnetic curtain” of the whole device (how I will do it later, no matter how I tell you), as a result of which ALL of our generator is obtained hanging in the air !!! And no wires to it do not fit and do not move! This is already cool …

The main highlight of such a pairing is that according to the properties of the unipolar induction process itself, there is no resistance to the action, i.e. no self-induction (completely absent). Moreover, as Tesla has taught us, we are not that weakening the action of the opposition, but rather the opposite – we add our opposition to the action than we increase it all the time! With a conventional engine and generator, this would not work. So, we have a device that will infinitely increase its speed (friction is zero, – our magnetic curtain), making ourselves stronger and stronger !!! That’s because what Satanism;).
Unipolar Induction

A very attentive reader will notice that one small detail has remained unresolved. How to make a device useful. That is, how to relieve tension in the load. – Very simple, – the load must also be placed on the generator device itself (for example, a light bulb), and be integral with it;).

With the load, by the way, as Oliver Nichelson pointed out in his article (I like the editorial board from the 91st year even more than from the 93rd), we also have a great joke. Adding an external load to the generator circuit not only does not weaken it, it even strengthens and forces, working more intensively, to generate more current !!! This is generally a bad thing.

Hehe, if you really make such a thing, then it will simply break off from the mega-super speed, which it will achieve, so I suggest not to make a magnetic curtain, but to use ordinary bearings. Moreover, let’s remove the voltage from both ends (the center of the axes), as I suggested in my improvement of Tesla’s unipolar generator, i.e. Now we can use the resulting voltage for our own purposes (arbitrary external load). Thus, the rotation speed of our generator will not tend to infinity, but the strength of the current in order to burn the wire of the coils;). 

When a certain speed is reached, the generator will finally calm down and will not pick up faster turns (due to rolling friction in bearings and contacts). Well, sort of, they persuaded the generator not to overtake our dense age too much.

We can increase the total power of our generator by installing additional disks with coils on the common axis. After all, there will be no more sliding contacts (we connect them with wires directly). What else is good is the very low cost of such a generator. All we need is a few metal (copper can) disks and a little thick wire (the diameter of the wire should be equal to the thickness of the disk).

Later, as suggested, Tesla “hammered” on a mechanical superunit generator (as all inventors do when they achieve the full realization of the idea) and, apparently, came up with a completely electrostatic generator, in which nothing is spinning at all. If such a device existed, then in time, I will definitely come to a similar idea and re-invent, after Tesla, this thing;).See you.*
Unipolar Induction

After 5 years I can make clarifications on the data of this article. I will not reinvent the wheel, but simply quote the correct data:

“The unipolar generator (a ring-shaped magnet with a circumference and a conducting disk, the EMF is removed from the axis and the edge of the disk) has the following features: 
– the magnet rotates, the disk costs – EMF = 0, 
– the disk rotates, the magnet is – EMF = E1, 
– the disk and the magnet rotate together – EMF = E1, 
– the disk rotates, the magnet rotates in any direction at any speed – EMF = E1.

Unipolar motor of the same design (voltage is applied to the axis and the edge of the disk): 
– the disk is fixed, the magnet has the ability to rotate – when the voltage is applied to the disk, the magnet costs, 
– the magnet is fixed, the disk can rotate – when a voltage is applied to the disk, it (the disk) rotates, 
– the disk is fixed on the magnet – when the voltage is applied to the disk, the magnet with the disk fixed on it rotates (in its own field!).

Two homogeneous magnets have the ability to independently rotate around one axis. We begin to rotate one magnet, the other is (magnetic bearing). On any magnet placed near a rotating homogeneous magnet, the ENVIRONMENT DOES NOT WORK!
Unipolar Induction

Thus, the movement (rotation) of the carrier of a UNIFORM magnetic field does not manifest in any way in any system of coordination and cannot be detected by any devices! The carrier is moving – the field is worth it!

The magnetic field DOES NOT BELONG TO THE CARRIER, it is not a “special form of matter”, but is a distortion of a certain medium (ether?). It turns out that for the guidance of the EMF, the conductor must move relative to this medium, and not relative to the carrier field. These effects should manifest themselves in open space, where the environment is not shielded. Such an effect was discovered in the experiment on the shuttle in the program “Electrodynamic tether” when the forces induced in a 20-kilometer cable and EMF tore to shreds the cable and the shuttle received the strongest discharge to the hull.

Unfortunately, the physical foundations of the electric and magnetic fields are unknown. Modeling the magnetic field with a vortex flow of an ideal fluid (common in modern physics) is outrageous and illiterate (excusable, however, for the 19th century)! Accordingly, the “everyday views” about electromagnetism of the great theorists and professors — Tamm and Landau — described in their textbooks are not worth a dried fly. ”

I will note only the most important thing: the current-collecting wire MUST be movable relative to the current-generating disc, otherwise it will not work. In view of this, it is necessary to give a correction to the theoretical improvements described above, that is, without fail, the current must be passed through fixed conductors attached to the device case.
Unipolar Induction